Fórum Profissional
Sobre a ABDA
Quem Somos
Carta de Princípios
da ABDA

ABDA e Colaboradoras
no Brasil

Como se associar
Entre em contato

Sobre o TDAHI
O que é TDAH
Quadro Clínico
Diagnóstico - Crianças
Diagnóstico - Adultos
Tratamento
Links Relacionados
Livros
Vídeos
Textos
Reportagens
Atualização Científica
Saiu na Imprensa
TDAH e Escolas
Eventos ABDA
Outros Eventos sobre
TDAH



Médicos
Psicólogos


Locais Públicos


Atualização de fevereiro de 2009


1. Atomoxetine and Osmotically Released Methylphenidate for the Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Acute Comparison and Differential Response

Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:721-730

Jeffrey H. Newcorn, M.D., Christopher J. Kratochvil, M.D., Albert J. Allen, M.D., Ph.D., Charles D. Casat, M.D., Dustin D. Ruff, Ph.D., Rodney J. Moore, Ph.D., and David Michelson, M.D.
Atomoxetine/Methylphenidate Comparative Study Group

OBJECTIVE: Response to atomoxetine, a nonstimulant norepinephrine-specific reuptake inhibitor, was compared with the effect of osmotic-release oral methylphenidate, a long-acting methylphenidate preparation, in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHOD: In a large placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients ages 6–16 with ADHD, any subtype, were randomly assigned to receive 0.8–1.8 mg/kg per day of atomoxetine (N=222), 18–54 mg/day of osmotically released methylphenidate (N=220), or placebo (N=74) for 6 weeks. The a priori specified primary analysis compared response (at least 40% decrease in ADHD Rating Scale total score) to osmotically released methylphenidate with response to atomoxetine and placebo. After 6 weeks, patients treated with methylphenidate were switched to atomoxetine under double-blind conditions. RESULTS: The response rates for both atomoxetine (45%) and methylphenidate (56%) were markedly superior to that for placebo (24%), but the response to osmotically released methylphenidate was superior to that for atomoxetine. Each medication was well tolerated, with completion rates and discontinuations for adverse events not significantly different from those for placebo.

Of the 70 subjects who did not respond to methylphenidate, 30 (43%) subsequently responded to atomoxetine. Likewise, 29 (42%) of the 69 patients who did not respond to atomoxetine had previously responded to osmotically released methylphenidate.

CONCLUSION: Response was significantly greater with osmotically released methylphenidate than with atomoxetine. One-third of patients who received methylphenidate followed by atomoxetine responded better to one or the other, suggesting that there may be preferential responders.


2. Effect of Stimulants on Height and Weight: A Review of the Literature.

Faraone SV, Biederman J, Morley CP, Spencer TJ.

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 20.

OBJECTIVE: Stimulant medications are effective treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, but concerns remain about their effects on growth.

METHOD: We provide a quantitative analysis of longitudinal studies about deficits in expected growth among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with stimulant medication. Study selection criteria were use of DSM criteria or clear operational definitions for hyperactivity or minimal brain dysfunction; outcome measures including raw, standardized, or percentile measurement of change in height and/or weight; first assessment of effects on growth occurred during childhood; and follow-up for at least 1 year. For issues not suitable for quantitative analyses, we provide a systematic, qualitative review.

RESULTS: The quantitative analyses showed that treatment with stimulant medication led to statistically significant delays in height and weight. This review found statistically significant evidence of attenuation of these deficits over time. The qualitative review suggested that growth deficits may be dose dependent, deficits may not differ between methylphenidate and amphetamine, treatment cessation may lead to normalization of growth, and further research should assess the idea that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder itself may be associated with dysregulated growth.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with stimulants in childhood modestly reduced expected height and weight. Although these effects attenuate over time and some data suggest that ultimate adult growth parameters are not affected, more work is needed to clarify the effects of continuous treatment from childhood to adulthood. Although physicians should monitor height, deficits in height and weight do not appear to be a clinical concern for most children treated with stimulants.

3. Very Low Birth Weight and Behavioral Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Young Adulthood: The Helsinki Study of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Adults

Sonja Strang-Karlsson, M.D., Katri Räikkönen, Ph.D., Anu-Katriina Pesonen, Ph.D., Eero Kajantie, M.D., Ph.D., E. Juulia Paavonen, M.D., Ph.D., Jari Lahti, M.A., Petteri Hovi, M.D., Kati Heinonen, Ph.D., Anna-Liisa Järvenpää, M.D., Ph.D., Johan G. Eriksson, M.D., Ph.D., and Sture Andersson, M.D., Ph.D.

Am J Psychiatry July 15, 2008

OBJECTIVE: Children with very low birth weight (<1500 g) are at increased risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Whether this increased risk continues into adulthood is unknown. The authors assessed behavioral symptoms of ADHD in a well-characterized cohort of very-low-birth-weight young adults who were either small for gestational age (less than two standard deviations below the Finnish mean) or appropriate for gestational age (within two standard deviations of the mean).

METHOD: A total of 162 very-low-birth-weight subjects (small for gestational age: N=52; appropriate for gestational age: N=110) and 172 term comparison subjects 18 to 27 years of age completed the Adult Problem Questionnaire, which yielded six exploratory factor analysis-derived subscales. Participants were also asked about substance use.

RESULTS: Very-low-birth-weight adults in the small for gestational age subgroup scored higher on the executive dysfunctioning and emotional instability subscales of the Adult Problem Questionnaire than did those in the appropriate for gestational age subgroup and the comparison group. The appropriate for gestational age and comparison groups had similar scores on these subscales. On the alcohol use subscale of the Adult Problem Questionnaire, both the appropriate and small for gestational age subgroups scored lower than comparison subjects and also reported fewer risk-taking behaviors (alcohol, smoking, and use of recreational drugs) than did comparison subjects.

CONCLUSIONS: Rather than very low birth weight per se, intrauterine growth retardation, as reflected by small for gestational age status in the very-low-birth-weight subjects, confers a risk for behavioral and emotional adversity related to ADHD in young adulthood.


4. Comorbidity of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder: prevalence and clinical correlates
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2008; Lut Tamam, Gonca Karakus and Nurgul Ozpoyraz
Department of Psychiatry, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01330 Adana, Turkey.

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity with lifetime bipolar disorder, and the influence of this comorbidity on various demographic and clinical variables in patients. Patients (n = 159) with a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder (79 female, 80 male) were included in this study. All patients were interviewed for the presence of current adult and childhood ADHD diagnosis and other axis I psychiatric disorder comorbidities using the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children—Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). The subjects also completed a Wender Utah rating scale (WURS-25) and a Current Symptoms Scale for ADHD symptoms. In particular, patients’ clinical characteristics, the age of onset of bipolar disorder, and the number of episodes were noted.

Twenty-six of the 159 bipolar patients (16.3%) were diagnosed with adult ADHD, while another subgroup of patients (n = 17, 10.7%) received a diagnosis of childhood ADHD but did not fulfill criteria for adult ADHD. Both of these two subgroups (patients with adult ADHD, and patients with only childhood ADHD) had an earlier age of onset of the disease and a higher number of previous total affective or depressive episodes than those without any lifetime ADHD comorbidity. However only bipolar patients with adult ADHD comorbidity had higher lifetime comorbidity rates for axis I psychiatric disorders, such as panic disorder and alcohol abuse/dependence, compared to patients without lifetime ADHD. Bipolar patients with comorbid adult ADHD did not differ from bipolar patients with comorbid childhood ADHD in terms of any demographic or clinical variables except for adult ADHD scale scores. In conclusion, ADHD is a common comorbidity in bipolar patients, and it adversely affects the course of the disease and disrupts the social adjustment of the patients.

Regular monitoring of ADHD will help to prevent problems and complications that could arise in the course of the disease, particularly in patients with early onset bipolar disorder.

5. Methylphenidate in Children With Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Both Comorbid Chronic Multiple Tic Disorder and ADHD.

J Child Neurol. 2008 May 12.

Gadow KD, Nolan EE, Sverd J, Sprafkin J, Schneider J.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, State University of New York, Stony Brook.

Our primary objective was to determine if immediate-release methylphenidate is an effective treatment for oppositional defiant disorder diagnosed from mother's report in children with both chronic multiple tic disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Children (n = 31) aged 6 to 12 years received placebo and 3 doses of methylphenidate twice daily for 2 weeks each under double-blind conditions and were assessed with ratings scales and laboratory measures. Results indicated significant improvement in both oppositional and ADHD behaviors with medication; however, the magnitude of treatment effect varied considerably as a function of disorder (ADHD > Oppositional behaviors), informant (teacher > mother), assessment instrument, and specific oppositional behavior (rebellious > disobeys rules).

Drug response was comparable with that in children (n = 26) who did not have diagnosed oppositional defiant disorder, but comorbidity appeared to alter the perceived benefits for ADHD according to mother's report. Methylphenidate is an effective short-term treatment for oppositional behavior in children with comorbid ADHD and chronic multiple tic disorder.



Outros textos:

Atualização de setembro de 2010

Atualização de agosto de 2010

Atualização de julho de 2010

Atualização de junho de 2010

Atualização de maio 2010

Atualização de Abril de 2010

Atualização de Março de 2010

Atualização de Fevereiro de 2010

Atualização de Janeiro de 2010

Atualização de Dezembro de 2009

Atualização de Novembro de 2009

Atualização de setembro de 2009

Atualização de agosto de 2009

Atualização de julho de 2009

Atualização de junho de 2009

Atualização de maio de 2009

Atualização de abril de 2009

Atualização de março de 2009

Atualização de dezembro de 2008

Atualização de Novembro de 2008

Atualização de outubro de 2008

Atualização de Setembro de 2008

Atualização de Julho de 2008

Atualização de Junho de 2008

Atualização de Maio de 2008

Atualização de Abril de 2008

Atualização de Março de 2008

Atualização de Fevereiro de 2008

Atualização de Janeiro de 2008

Atualização de Novembro de 2007

Atualização de Outubro de 2007

Atualização de Agosto de 2007

Atualização de julho de 2007

Atualização de junho de 2007

Atualização de maio de 2007

Atualização de abril de 2007

Atualização de março de 2007

Atualização de fevereiro de 2007

Atualização de janeiro de 2007

Atualização de dezembro de 2006

Atualização de novembro de 2006 - Parte 2

Atualização de novembro de 2006 - Parte 1

Atualização de outubro de 2006

Atualização de setembro de 2006 - Parte 2

Atualização de setembro de 2006

Atualização de agosto de 2006 - Parte 1

Atualização de julho de 2006

Atualização de maio de 2006

Atualização de janeiro de 2006

Atualização de novembro de 2005

Atualização de outubro de 2005